Cross-Border M&A in Telecommunications & Data Centers: Where Global Connectivity Meets Local Control in 2025

Telecommunications networks and data centers are often viewed as the most natural candidates for cross-border ownership. Traffic is global, data flows continuously, demand growth is visible, and revenues are supported by long-term contracts. In 2025, these characteristics continue to attract aggressive interest from global infrastructure funds, sovereign investors, and strategic operators seeking exposure to digital backbone assets. Yet outcomes in this sector increasingly diverge from underwriting expectations. Cross-border transactions in telecommunications and data centers are not constrained by demand or asset quality, but by the degree to which ownership, control, and influence are permitted once local regulatory, security, and customer sensitivities are engaged.

‍

The most persistent misconception in this sector is that digital infrastructure is inherently borderless. While connectivity may span continents, the infrastructure that enables it is increasingly treated as national in character. Governments in 2025 view telecom networks and data centers through the lenses of national security, data sovereignty, emergency communications resilience, and economic competitiveness. Cross-border ownership changes now trigger heightened scrutiny even when assets are passive, carrier-neutral, or wholesale. Regulators are no longer focused solely on equity percentages. They examine operational influence, governance rights, access to network data, and visibility into traffic and customer information. Buyers who model scale and redundancy often find themselves constrained by regulatory assessments centered on control and exposure.

‍

Data centers, in particular, are frequently mischaracterized as yield-driven real estate with power attached. In practice, they operate as sensitive digital ecosystems whose value depends on more than land, energy availability, and connectivity. In 2025, power sourcing and grid priority, environmental and water-use regulation, customer concentration among hyperscalers, and data localization rules all materially influence performance. Ownership changes can prompt customer reassessment, especially among government, financial services, healthcare, and defense-adjacent tenants. Even when existing leases remain intact, expansion commitments, pre-leasing of new capacity, and long-term growth assumptions may slow as customers evaluate jurisdictional risk. Assets that appear contractually stable can therefore become strategically constrained.

‍

Telecommunications licensing introduces a parallel but distinct set of challenges. Buyers often assume that licenses and spectrum rights are embedded in the operating entity and will transfer seamlessly with ownership. In reality, licenses are granted on the basis of trust in ownership, governance, and long-term stewardship. Cross-border transactions routinely prompt regulators to reassess the fitness and propriety of new owners, compliance with national ownership thresholds, lawful interception and network access obligations, and commitments related to coverage, service quality, and pricing. In 2025, license continuity is rarely automatic. Behavioral remedies, governance restrictions, and ownership caps are increasingly imposed, altering the economics and control profile of the transaction after signing.

‍

Customer behavior adds another layer of constraint. While end users may focus on uptime and latency, large enterprise and institutional customers increasingly evaluate the jurisdiction of ultimate ownership and potential exposure to foreign government influence. In telecommunications and data centers, trust is embedded in the infrastructure itself. Ownership changes can trigger additional security audits, compliance reviews, and elongated contracting cycles, particularly in regulated industries. Revenue rarely collapses abruptly. Instead, growth becomes conditional, expansion pipelines slow, and renewal discussions become more cautious. These dynamics are difficult to model, yet they directly affect long-term value.

‍

As these realities emerge, cross-border telecom and data center transactions tend to narrow quickly. Initial enthusiasm based on utilization metrics and contracted cash flow gives way to regulatory feedback, customer diligence, and governance negotiations that constrain control. Deals that fail to address these issues early often stall mid-process, not because approval is denied outright, but because the economic and governance assumptions no longer align.

‍

Valuation outcomes in 2025 reflect this uncertainty. Despite strong underlying demand, cross-border transactions in telecommunications and data centers frequently trade at a discount to domestic equivalents. Buyers price in approval risk, extended timelines, limits on operational control, customer hesitation around expansion, and ongoing compliance obligations. Two assets with similar utilization rates and EBITDA profiles can produce materially different outcomes depending on how constrained ownership and governance become post-close. Valuation increasingly reflects confidence in permitted control rather than asset quality alone.

‍

Transaction structure has therefore become foundational rather than optional. Minority or non-controlling investments, staged ownership increases tied to regulatory milestones, jurisdiction-specific operating entities, ring-fencing of sensitive network or data functions, and governance frameworks designed to limit foreign influence are now common. These structures do not eliminate regulatory or customer risk, but they align capital exposure with what control regimes will realistically allow. Structure becomes the mechanism through which buyers learn what can be owned, governed, and influenced over time.

‍

The importance of this discipline has intensified in 2025. Explosive AI-driven demand for data center capacity has heightened the strategic importance of digital infrastructure. Scrutiny of foreign investment has increased alongside geopolitical tension around data and communications. Power grid constraints and sustainability mandates have added further layers of local regulation. Cross-border capital remains active and motivated, but only transactions designed around regulatory reality progress smoothly.

‍

For buyers and sellers alike, successful cross-border M&A in telecommunications and data centers now requires realism. Buyers must recognize that global connectivity does not eliminate sovereignty or regulatory discretion. Sellers must understand that asset quality and contracted revenue do not guarantee transferability of control. Advisors play a critical role in bridging global capital with local constraints. Cross-border advisory remains essential not to slow investment, but to ensure that digital infrastructure remains operable, trusted, and economically viable once ownership crosses borders.